|
|
The Champlain Map
Samuel Champlain's map of the region gives us
several valuable clues in the search for Carantouan.
Use the
following link to view Champlain's map of the region in 1632 -
http://www.mapsofpa.com/17thcentury/1632champlain.jpg
Note - Carantouannais is located
straight above the "300 marker" on the bottom of this map, and clearly shows
a grand palisaded area on the west branch of the river.
My opinion is that by reading the
excerpts from various sources as well as "Voyages" and then looking at the
maps is that "Carantouannais" stood for a whole REGION or NATION (it was
referred to as a NATION) not unlike the Iroquois Nation - that Spanish Hill
is probably that area on Champlain's map that is fortified and on the river
that splits to the left (on the Chemung). Below, you will find more reasons
for my opinion.
Note the THREE VILLAGES~
|
|
In Champlain's quote
describing the location of Carantounnais he states:
"They have only three
villages, which are in the midst of more than twenty others, on which
they make war without assistance from their friends; for they are obliged
to pass through the thickly settled country of the Chouontouaroueon,[138]
or else they would have to make a very long circuit."
Look at the map again - -
There are three villages AND the fortified area to the west
branch...was this fortified area (Spanish Hill?) for the
Carantouannais nation?
|
 |
The three villages said to make up the Caranouannai
nation are:
-
Oscolui: (meaning "sweet water" and therefore thought be located in the area
of Sugar Creek, PA ) There is actually a site sign off of Rte 6 below
Burlington, PA that marks the site. Also - Moorehead reported that it had a
hill with a fortifies hilltop - much like Spanish Hill there - but smaller.
(Moorehead 1936:70)
-
Onnontioga: (onnon - people of , tioga - where the rivers meet) The
Murray Farm located near Tioga Point, Athens, PA was in fact the site of an
Andaste burial ground of which Moorehead reported "The chief excavations of
the Susquehanna River Expedition centered around an old Andaste cemetery on
the old Murray Farm. (Moorehead 1936:1)
-
Gahontoto: I believe this to be located in Nichols, New York. (Englebert
site) Notice the flag on this village site - - it must have been the
"capital" and probably the largest of the three)
** I must note here that before me, most believe
that Gahontoto was in Wyalusing, PA because there is evidence of a great
battle there. However Clark, Moorehead, nor even Louise Welles Murray knew
of the Nichols site in their lifetimes, as it was discovered in the late
1960's. My opinion is that this in itself does not mean there was a village
site there - - Instead, I think because the largest village site ever found
in our region is in Nichols New York - and they even found pottery there
like that found on the Murray site (Onnontioga) - the Englebert Site in
Nichols should be considered to have been the real Gahontoto. Unfortunately,
there is little in the form of reports available on this site to date.
However, I was lucky enough to hear a presentation on the excavations there
by Dan Caister of NY Archaeology's TriCities Chapter. This group's was
involved with the digs there in the late 1960's.
Watch this video clip (#17) to learn more now!
|
Concerning Carantouannai
(Andastoe) Nation:
J. Gilmary Shea - "Notes and Queries of the
Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography - published January 1878 -
page 103-108 - "General John S. Clark has taken the the Champlain
Expedition seriously and the results attained are remarkable, and seem
destined to afford scholars a satisfactory solution of vexed
questions"..."General Clark's next object is to study the territory of the
group of tribes known to Champlain as the Carantouannais or Andastes
who formed a confederacy like the Hurons, Neuter and Iroquois groups."
(General Clark began his survey of Spanish Hill in May 1878)
Jesuit Relations - PREFACE TO VOL. XXXIII : "The Hurons send envoys to the Andastes, allied tribes
along the Susquehanna, to ask aid against their foes. The latter,
upon this appeal, request the hostile Iroquois to lay down their arms and
consent so a peace." - (page 9)
Louise Welles Murray - (footnote page 34) - "Old
Tioga Point and Early Athens" - "The editor of
Champlain ("Voyages") introduces a note of great interest, saying that the
name of these allies "Carantouannai" was only a special name, a tribal, or
a village name of the Andaste nation..."
Excerpt from Champlain's "Voyages"
concerning the decision and need to "collect" and prepare them:
"When the council was ended
and it was decided to send the men, orders were given to collect, prepare,
and arm them, so as to go and join us where we were encamped before the
fort and the village of our enemies. This was only three short days
journey from Carantouan, which was provided with more than 800 warriors,
and strongly fortified, after the manner of those before described, which
have high and strong palisades well bound and joined together, the
quarters being constructed in a similar fashion."
From this, I wonder if
Champlain was not referring to a "region" and not a specific location when
he referred to Carantouannais. In other words, by only looking for
evidence of a village that would support 800 warriors on Spanish Hill and
just below it, did we miss the point that these maps seem to show? And
might this be the reason why it took the Carantouannais and Brule a few
days to get there warriors together to join Champlain? Louise Welles
Murray ("Early Athens and Old Tioga Point") said that there was a
substantial burial ground found on the old Murray farm - - located near
Tioga Point (Onnontioga?) with a significant amount of graves. What
if the "Hill" was only used for ceremonies or celebrations such as when
Brule arrived, or during attacks, and wasn't actually a VILLAGE SITE?
Look at Champlain's map
again...
Just
WHAT IS this I circled in red? |

|
Look at it
in size reference to the villages and "cabins" nearby...it must have
been quite large...don't you think? |
The discrepancy concerning the Champlain Map
~~Susquehanna or
Delaware?~~
As you look closely at
the map - you will see that the river on which Carantouan resides, does not
seem to go to the Chesapeake Bay, and therefore has been questioned as to
whether it is actually the Susquehanna...
But, it seems clear to that
Samuel Champlain was comfortable navigating from the north - not from the
south, and if there is to be any misunderstanding on his illustrations -
it should be from the south moving north and not from the north moving
south. That is - I believe he would have been able to show relative
location to the areas he himself spent so many years exploring. The
misunderstandings would be more likely to occur when he drew areas from
second hand accounts from people such as his interpreter, Etienne Brule.
The reason why I feel the need to state this,
is because I must note that there are historians that believe he drew this river to be the
Delaware - and not the Susquehanna. However, after looking at the text that -
he would have only known that this river "went to the sea" secondhand through
Brule. With this in mind, where Champlain ends up drawing river that
Carantouannais was on leading into the sea would most likely be pure speculation on his
part. Where he draws it relative the the land he is familiar with to the north is to me
the most reliable method to determine where Champlain understood it to be.
read below for another possible explanation:
A growing understanding of
the land....and river systems.
As I looked at more and more
maps - I found that there was a general confusion about the exact mapping
of the Susquehanna and the Delaware and found several instances where they
were mapped to actually meet, but note on Champlain's map there are
"3" major rivers coming in from the Atlantic in stead of the two
in the earlier maps...
|

|
 |
|
Ortelius, Abraham,
1584
|
de Jode, Cornelis,
1593 |
|

|

|
|
Quad, Matthias,
1600 |
Champlain, Samuel,
1632 |
Note~
on the bottom two maps - there is a mark for a large fort - at the
north side of the inlet of the SECOND river to the north on the 1600 map -
but it is located on the north side of the THIRD river to the north on the Champlain
map (marked with .)
This is what General John S. Clark had this to say about Champlain's
map:
"Champlain published a map in 1632, and from information furnished by Brule,
located this town a short distance north of the junction of two main branches if a river,
on the west branch some distance further north than New York City. But unfortunately
he was misled by other mapmakers, who preceded him, and made this river flow into the
Delaware Bay. The mistake was made originally by Captain
Hendrickson, the discoverer of Delaware Bay and river, and was not corrected until
many years after the publication (which leads me to believe it WAS CORRECTED) of
Champlain's map. By cutting off this river from it's connection with the Delaware Bay and
connecting it with the Chesapeake all difficulties immediately vanish as to the location
of the famous Indian town, which I identify, as located beyond any possible question on
the hill near Waverly, on the east bank of the Chemung, just south of the state
line." ~ General John S. Clark
Here is General Clark's "Fac-Simile" of
Champlain's map: (from The Selected
Manuscripts of General John S. Clark.)

|